|
|
|||||||
| LOUD NOISES A place for political mudslinging, Pro/Anti legalization, gay marriage debate, Gun control rants, etc. If it's political, controversial, or hotly debated, it goes here. No regular Off-Topic stuff allowed. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING! |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
11-11-2020, 09:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
Philosopher King
 
|
Making a ruling is not making an argument on behalf of the petitioner. It would be entirely inappropriate for the judge to make any decision outside of what is specifically alleged, and as of now nothing had been.
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
11-11-2020, 09:04 AM
|
#2 | |
|
BANNED
 Join Date: May 2019
Location: Florida-FAIL
Posts: 2,495
Trader Rating: (8)
  Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
Quote:
Will all just have to wait and see.... |
|
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 10:08 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Yes, I look like that
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In my supervillain's lair
Posts: 27,980
Trader Rating: (19)
  Feedback Score: 19 reviews
|
Quote:
The judges don't seem to buy it. State that are within "automatic recount" territory will do so and we always knew that. It seems though, that if there was a case to be made in regards to some voting irregularity or outright laws broken, then they admin would be making that case. It is almost as if they seem to think that running out the clock will work. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
