General politics discussion. Keep it civil.

Originally Posted by Phlip

Meanwhile, in the state of Arizona, the Mormon Church is "protected" from reporting child abusers.
[link]
Those fuckin transgenders and drag queens win again! Now they've infiltrated the churches and are out here grooming without consequence.

So your point is what, that two wrongs somehow make it right?
I dunno about you, but if I had a choice between being sexually abused by:
a) priest
b) trans

i would choose:
c) none of the above.

You're being petty and ignorant. besides, is there a national church month? church books about lubing up the rear?

i dont get it, whats with progressives constantly wanting to mess with the exit hole. yawl some nasty mothafuckas

[Phlip]

Originally Posted by ixfxi

So your point is what, that two wrongs somehow make it right?
I dunno about you, but if I had a choice between being sexually abused by:
a) priest
b) trans

i would choose:
c) none of the above.

i dont get it, whats with progressives constantly wanting to mess with the exit hole. yawl some nasty mothafuckas

The point is that the ONLY person claiming that drag queens and trans people are molesting children are doing so with no evidence. Meanwhile, those SAME people are making excuses for the clergy and others villainizing those same drag performers and transgender people.

No one on the left is arguing FOR abusing children. Meanwhile, the religious right is fighting with everything they have to PROTECT their own as they do just that.
Looks like their constant projection is a form of confession.
But by all means, I am the one being "petty and ignorant" while you continue to move the goalposts to make a point or some kind of silly-fuck joke instead of actually addressing anything.

Originally Posted by Phlip

The point is that the ONLY person claiming that drag queens and trans people are molesting children are doing so with no evidence. Meanwhile, those SAME people are making excuses for the clergy and others villainizing those same drag performers and transgender people.

No one on the left is arguing FOR abusing children. Meanwhile, the religious right is fighting with everything they have to PROTECT their own as they do just that.
Looks like their constant projection is a form of confession.
But by all means, I am the one being "petty and ignorant" while you continue to move the goalposts to make a point or some kind of silly-fuck joke instead of actually addressing anything.

homeboy, you lost me. the left is totally FOR abusing children.

- people who are NOT for abusing children are teaching the kids to ride bikes, play with toys, and socialize.

conversely

- people who ARE for abusing children are teaching kids the ride sybians, play with dildos and be anti-social mask wearing freaks who dye their hair and communicate through screens

my points are clear as day. i can tell you how to beat super mario brothers but gaddamn, you want me to play the game and connect the dots for you.

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by Phlip

The point is that the ONLY person claiming that drag queens and trans people are molesting children are doing so with no evidence. Meanwhile, those SAME people are making excuses for the clergy and others villainizing those same drag performers and transgender people.

No one on the left is arguing FOR abusing children. Meanwhile, the religious right is fighting with everything they have to PROTECT their own as they do just that.
Looks like their constant projection is a form of confession.
But by all means, I am the one being "petty and ignorant" while you continue to move the goalposts to make a point or some kind of silly-fuck joke instead of actually addressing anything.

This would indicate that is a lie....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ds-gender.html

A proposed amendment to a bill in California would classify parents who refuse to affirm their child's gender as abusive and could result in revoked custody.

AB957, proposed by Democratic Assemblymember Lori Wilson and state Senator Scott Wiener, amends the state Family Code which addresses the 'health, safety, and welfare of the child' in every household.

If passed, the law could see children pulled from their parents' home if their family members have what the state deems anti-LGBTQ+ ideals.

Rep. Wilson - who has a transgender son - said during a recent meeting that she believes parents supporting their child's gender is in the 'best interests' of the kid

How come these virtue signaling wack jobs all magically have pre-school aged non-gender conforming trans kids these days?


Funny you mention religion.... Rep Weiner and some bull supporters....



Totally not a groomer....

https://www.kpbs.org/news/local/2022...nsgender-youth