![]() |
|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 |
Nissanaholic!
![]() |
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (drift freaq @ Mar. 24 2002,4:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hipposleek says ....
take a second look at my post and see what comes before it before you give me the face there tough guy ---------------- oh so you have to call me tough guy hahahhahhaha ------------------------------- and once again he murmurs Note that I said at charging 160% of retail, they will eventually turn a profit. That is the reality of the business. ------------------------------- ok you wanna play this way . we can. whats the retail price for a Skyline in the States? There is none . So it turns into a situation of what the market will bear. econ101 ----------------------- and he says yet more I'm not saying there in it to screw you, that's just the way it works out. No R34 is worth 911 prices, IMHO --------------------------------------- 911's are overrated and priced IMHO ------------------------------------- and his last but least statements BUT - that's what it takes to get one here, so that's the best you can hope for... well, that and some lube. Supply and demand ---------------------------------- and here is where you fall all over yourself. they don't charge 160% over retail. you should do the math again . Car costs 60K in Japan R434 GTR for example. NOw they bring it over here dot and legalize it . Now with shipping and what not that is going to be another 10K-20K on average hmmmm 115k-80K 35K profit on a 80k investment sounds like standard business to me not gross over profit.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> Ugh - okay... I'll take it from the bottom up: The website says the price is $95K for $60K car. That is a $35K mark up on a $60K price. Now, go back to the part that you quoted a bit further up and notice that I said "160% of retail" not 160% above retail. The math is rough, I understand, but generally a $35K price increase would make the total just over 50% additional (150% = $90K). <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/huh.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':huh:'> (BTW: if I had used your $115K price - it would be almost 100% mark up) Note, additionally, that the retail price stated was the price in Japan - obviously, the retail price of a Skyline in the states is whatever Motorex charges <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sigh.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=' ![]() As for a Skyline being worth the price of a 911 - well, that's a matter of taste. At any rate, 911's sell all over the world for about the same price, while the R34 sells for an relatively inflated sum in the US. If the car were worth 160% of retail - wouldn't Nissan sell it for that in the UK or Japan? Isn't it whatever the market will bear? Let's face it, kids pour $20K into Civics and they are still slower than Moosetangs and not 1/2 as attractice as an M3. Basic supply and demand curves are out of the issue and fanatacism is in. "Cool" has a price - in the case of the R34, it is about 160% of international retail. Now, my argument for why, like it or not, Motorex is on target is that they are adding value to a product that a small segment of society is willing to pay for. While you could have better performing cars for less money - you can only have an R34 from them. Shipping and updating, however, do not cost anywhere near $20K - if it did, Motorex would NEVER make a profit. Don't try to tell people that it takes half of the price of the car to put a few sensors, a couple air bags and a bumper support on a car. It is finding out how to do this and getting it approved by the feds that is the hard part. The important fact that everyone is leaving out is development/ start up costs! Motorex's costs were front loaded - meaning that it probably cost them US $1-2M to get ONE Skyline into the states and sold retail (no - I don't have no idea if that price is in the ball park... it's a hypothetical). The second one was probably $60K (car price) + maybe a few thousand for shipping and updating. BUT, they have to recapture that $1-2M initial expenditure if they ever want to break even. As a result, they charge an extra $30K/car for every car and start to finally turn a profit after selling 50-100 cars. After that, they either make extreme profits or lower prices to compete with other cars being sold at their non-fanatic market price. That, I believe is the reality. That means that yes - it is a high mark up. Yes - some will be willing to pay it. No - there is nothing shady or unfair about it. Yes - it is a perfectly valid standard business practice. No - I don't think they're screwing anyone. Yes - I do think people are getting screwed (by themselves for willing to pay $95K for a $60K car). <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt='???'> What're you gonna do? So there <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sly.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':sly:'> <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=' ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|