![]() |
|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
1998 240sx 2jz swap in progress 2006 FULLY built WRX Rotated w/ PPG's |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#2 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,772
Trader Rating: (38)
![]() Feedback Score: 38 reviews
|
Quote:
Again, this thread requires understanding and research on how wheel fitment/offset work. Not to be spoon fed information. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Man w/ CTSV & a Car Seat
![]() |
Rim face design. Having low offset wont do any good when the face is flat and has no depth compared to the mounting pad. Work has 3 different faces for each of their wheels to compensate for brake clearance. You have O-disk (least brake clearance but most rim lip afforded), A-disk (standard) and R-disk (most brake clearance, but smaller rim lip).
You can run 0 offset O-disk but you'd still have brake clearance issue and will need 12-15mm spacers to clear Z32/R32/33 brakes. If you run the R-disk, itll clear even Brembos upfront. Rears, O-disk will clear Z32/R32/33 brakes by a cunt hair (literally). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Leaky Injector
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 35
Posts: 134
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Okay So i have an s13 and it does not have coils i will plan to get some and drop it a inch or maybe a little more. This is my dd. I do not want it slammed to the floor or hella flushed. I want it to the rim to be flush with the fender however. I was thinking 17x8 or 17x8.5 or 17x9. I don't want staggered rims or anything really( i heard it does not matter for performance and is a look thing). What offsets should i be getting to clear brakes and coilovers? I would rather not have to roll my fenders.
Also id prefer a none sunken in look ![]() The front rim here is perfect but the rear one is sunken in and has a concaved look(guessing due to negative camber). I dont know lots really cause ive searched and get random answers like people said +35 offsets and stuff are gay honda ones and bad for RWD cars and then others say they are good and work on s13s perfect with no modification and then i see others wanting like +20 or +10 offsets. I do get how it creates rubbing but dont know enough about the s13 chassis. Thanks for the answers in advance sorry if my question is dumb. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
![]() I was wondering if this ride height (exactly) was achievable on TEIN's; more specifically Super Drifts or Mono Flex... Edit: just found the article to find out they're on TEIN's.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,772
Trader Rating: (38)
![]() Feedback Score: 38 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
Should have gone with 17's. It requires less work to make them look good. Trade a pair for 17's if you have to. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va
Age: 37
Posts: 5,730
Trader Rating: (31)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 31 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
Slip Gypsies Blog Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Leaky Injector
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 35
Posts: 134
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Ok so im back with a more proper idea of what i want. So i got k sport coil overs and im going to do around a 2 inch drop. My fenders have been rolled.
I want to know what rim offset i should get and i'm going to get Gramlights 57d's in 17x9. Should i get the +12 +22 or +38? I want to have a normal daily driving car that I can also do drift and auto x with. I want it to be performance no hella flush gay shit so not too much negative camber. (Side note i also don't like my wheels looking that sunken in(concave) or the negative camber look that much) for this reason i thought +12 would be fine because its not to positive and with negative camber it wouldn't be to bad sunken in? Thanks for your inputs! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,772
Trader Rating: (38)
![]() Feedback Score: 38 reviews
|
Quote:
+12 is a nice sice. +22 will fit and won't be "hella flush ghey shit" +38 will require small spacers so it won't rub. FWIW, +12 fits well for looks and performance. Lots of people run it with more than a 2" drop. But with your intended drop, your car will look like donkey balls. Sure, it'll be "function over form" (if you get a proper alignment) but with today's suspension out in the market, people can have their cars mad low and still perform at the track. +12 It does sit flush and will require camber but you can always align your car/mod your fenders to be functional if you go lower than 2". Just because a car looks a certain way doesn't mean there can't be a functional side of it. And bumping my question: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Leaky Injector
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 35
Posts: 134
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
And what would be the differences in looks/camber needed and stuff of the +12 or +22? You seem to be recommending the +12 cause it will look better if i ever decide to go lower? is that right? Thanks for response! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Leaky Injector
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florida Panama City
Age: 39
Posts: 118
Trader Rating: (2)
![]() Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
Ok this is my situation I want to pick up some XXR 531 plats for my s13 coupe. The sizes I am lookin at are 17x9 +25 up front and a 17x10 +20 in the rear. I currently am only running lowering springs but I will be buying some coils soon. Will these wheel look flush with my current setup and what tires spec should I go with?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|